Our Work
13 Jan

Is NATO Prepared for the Future? Reflections on NATO 2030: United for a New Era

<strong>Wilson Center</strong>

by Wess Mitchell
Media Appearances
10 Jan

US risks enraging China by easing limits on Taiwan relations

<strong>Financial Times</stron

by Elbridge Colby
Media Commentary
10 Jan

State Dept. Moves to Ease Restrictions on Meeting With Taiwan Officials

<strong>New York Times</strong

by Elbridge Colby
Media Commentary
10 Jan

NYSE begins delisting China’s three largest state-run telecoms groups

<strong>Financial Times</stron

by Elbridge Colby
Media Commentary
28 Dec

Pushback on Xi’s Vision for China Spreads Beyond U.S.

<strong>Wall Street Journal</s

by Wess Mitchell
Media Commentary
24 Dec

How NATO Manages the “Bear” and the “Dragon”

<strong>ScienceDirect</strong>

by Elbridge Colby
Articles
21 Dec

Flareup feared in South China Sea due to power vacuum in U.S.

<strong>The Asahi Shimbun</str

by Elbridge Colby
Media Commentary
18 Dec

Live: The NATO 2030 Report, with Wess Mitchell

<strong>CNAS</strong> | Wess M

by Wess Mitchell
Media Appearances
16 Dec

Reflections on NATO: United for a New Era

<strong>CEPA</strong> | At a m

by Wess Mitchell
Media Appearances
16 Dec

Sources of Chinese Conduct: A Debate

<strong>CFTNI</strong> | More

by Elbridge Colby
Media Appearances
16 Dec

Two Possible Futures An outlook on EU-US relations

<strong>Köerber Stiftung</str

by Elbridge Colby
Articles
10 Dec

Under what conditions will we open to Russia

<strong>Limes Online</strong>

by Wess Mitchell
Media Commentary
09 Dec

Biden to face wary allies after four years of Trump’s ‘America First’ rhetoric

<strong>Washington Post</stron

by Wess Mitchell
Media Commentary
08 Dec

Questions swirl over Austin’s limited experience

<strong>Politico</strong> | Jo

by Elbridge Colby
Media Commentary
02 Dec

Interview with the former US Deputy Secretary of State

<strong>la Repubblica</strong>

by Wess Mitchell
Media Commentary
01 Dec

NATO Should Expand Its Focus to Include China, Report Says

<strong>Wall Street Journal</s

by Wess Mitchell
Media Commentary
30 Nov

NATO Needs to Adapt Quickly to Stay Relevant for 2030, Report Urges

<strong>New York Times</strong

by Wess Mitchell
Media Commentary
25 Nov

NATO 2030: United for a New Era

<strong>NATO</strong> | At the

by Wess Mitchell
Publications
21 Nov

Preparing for a new government’ in earnest…What are the challenges facing the Korean Peninsula?

<strong>CFTNI</strong> | Follo

by Elbridge Colby
Media Appearances
17 Nov

Taiwan Roundtable: Cross-Strait Relations in Pandemic Times

<strong>Sigur Center for Asian

by Elbridge Colby
Video and interviews
TMI-logo-blue
TMI-smalllogo-blue
  • Home
  • About
  • What We Do
  • Who We Are
  • Our Work
  • Contact Us

China, Foreign Affairs, and the Anti-Ideology Delusion

October 4, 2020
|
By Elbridge Colby
|
Media Appearances

The China challenge has revived an old and often arid quarrel about the relationship in foreign affairs between ideas and interests. Reconsidering that quarrel in light of the ideas that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) professes and the interests the People’s Republic of China (PRC) pursues provides a fresh understanding of the threats that China poses to freedom.

The extreme form of the debate is generally confined to the domain of political science professors in the field of international relations. On one side stand the so-called realists.

They maintain that the distribution of power within the international system — including the logic of, and the interests inherent in, countries’ particular geopolitical circumstances — drives nation-state conduct. On the other side stand those classified as idealists. They contend that a country’s ideas — government officials’ leading principles and favored doctrines, the people’s customary opinions and perspectives, and the habits of heart and mind of both — provide the key to nation-state conduct. These pure views appear among commentators and policymakers in watered-down form as dominant intellectual tendencies.

The case of the CCP and of the Chinese nation that it despotically governs proves the wisdom of the common-sense view: as with individuals so too with nation-states, ideas and interests are inextricably connected. The ideas to which the CCP is committed — a distinctive blend of dogmatic Marxism-Leninism and extreme Chinese nationalism — undergird the regime’s dictatorial rule at home. These ideas also fuel the party’s ambition to bring under Beijing’s sovereign control formerly free and democratic Hong Kong, still free and democratic Taiwan, and areas of the South China Sea far beyond China’s internationally recognized territorial waters; animate the party’s schemes to lure nations around the world into relations of economic dependence; and drive the CCP’s plan to reshape international organizations so that they conform to the principles of socialism as the party has decreed them.


RealClear Politics

Read More
Panel: Pace of Navy Freedom of Navigation Operations Stressing Force
Expert Panel Tells Lawmakers U.S. Needs to Do More to Counter Chinese Pacific Expansion
Elbridge Colby

About Elbridge Colby

Elbridge Colby is co-founder and principal of The Marathon Initiative, a policy initiative focused on developing strategies to prepare the United States for an era of sustained great power competition.
Site Map
  • Home
  • About
  • What We Do
  • Who We Are
  • Our Work
  • Contact Us
Recent Work
  • shutterstock_otherversion_0
    January 13, 2021
    Is NATO Prepared for the Future? Reflections on NATO 2030: United for a New Era
  • ft-china-taiwan
    January 10, 2021
    US risks enraging China by easing limits on Taiwan relations
  • merlin_181018080_0432addb-5abf-4896-8e16-f59a64c0fdfa-superJumbo
    January 10, 2021
    State Dept. Moves to Ease Restrictions on Meeting With Taiwan Officials

The Marathon Initiative © 2020 All Rights Reserved